🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations worked, and disclosed new appeals had come from mediators to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Route

The foreign minister is treading a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their authority to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Status

Iran's diplomats stated the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the offer could be revived in some form if talks resume.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He asserted the assaults began with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and cooperation, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Final Solution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the European states that had repeatedly tried to impose their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the primary resolution to resolve disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a answer in the identical approach."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the face of this invasion."